We throw the word “humanity” around a lot in art criticism. A painting is “deeply human.” A sculpture captures “the human condition.” But after spending an afternoon with the essays and lectures of the lesser-known but fiercely insightful critic Gary Towne, I’ve realized we’ve been using the term as a comfort blanket, not a scalpel.
Where most critics see the arc of art history as a climb toward realistic representation, Towne saw a slow, painful excavation of what we actually are: messy, contradictory beings. He prized the unfinished sketch over the polished masterpiece. He favored Rembrandt’s crusty, thick-painted self-portraits—where the flesh itself seems to be dissolving into shadow—over the silken surfaces of Ingres. gary towne perspectives on humanity in the fine arts
Towne famously rejected the Renaissance notion that humanity is best represented by idealized proportion. He looked at Da Vinci’s Vitruvian Man and saw not a celebration of potential, but a cage. “We don’t live in that circle,” Towne wrote in his 2003 collection, The Unfinished Figure . “We spill out of it. We are asymmetrical, anxious, and odorous.” We throw the word “humanity” around a lot
Beyond the Likeness: Gary Towne on the Fractured Mirror of Humanity in Art He prized the unfinished sketch over the polished