Τα καλάθι αγορών σας είναι άδειο!
In 2017-2018, everyone screamed “Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI) on the blockchain!” Kantara watched warily. They saw promise in decentralized identifiers (DIDs) and verifiable credentials (VCs). But they also saw vaporware. Instead of chasing hype, they did the hard work: they created the first ever DID Method Rubric —a way to objectively evaluate whether a blockchain-based ID system was actually secure, private, and decentralized. They grounded the hype in reality. Part V: The Unseen Guardian Today, Kantara Initiative is not a household name. You have probably used its work without knowing it. When you access a secure health portal in Canada, a government service in the UK, a bank account in Sweden, or a university system in Australia, there is a non-trivial chance that the trust framework governing that handshake was audited and accredited by Kantara.
Their founding manifesto was simple, almost heretical to the prevailing data-hoarding culture: kantarainitiative.org
Most users don’t care about trust frameworks. They just want to log in. Giant platforms like “Sign in with Apple” or “Google One Tap” offered seamless convenience, even if they were walled gardens. Kantara’s federated, user-controlled vision felt like extra work. Instead of chasing hype, they did the hard
OpenID Connect (OIDC) became the standard for “Log in with Google/Facebook.” But it was a wild west. Kantara stepped in and created interoperability profiles . They defined exactly how a compliant OIDC provider must handle consent, how long tokens last, how keys are rotated. Suddenly, “OIDC” wasn’t just a spec; with Kantara’s certification, it was a promise. You have probably used its work without knowing it
