Ludicrous Proxy Patched Here

—End of Article—

Or consider the of 1996, where a physicist submitted a gibberish paper to a humanities journal as a hoax. The paper was accepted. The scandal was contained. But the template was set: use the enemy’s own credibility against them by feeding them something so absurd that their acceptance of it delegitimizes them entirely. ludicrous proxy

In 2022, a court in a small European country received "video evidence" of a political figure accepting a bribe. The video was later revealed to be a deepfake created by a rival faction. But here is the ludicrous twist: the rival faction admitted it was a deepfake, then argued that the deepfake was a "artistic commentary" protected by free speech. The court spent eighteen months debating the legality of the commentary. The original bribery case was forgotten. —End of Article— Or consider the of 1996,

Another is —drowning the ludicrous proxy in an even more ludicrous response. When the mimes appear, the EPA sends its own mimes, who mime the arrest of the first mimes. The cascade of absurdity collapses under its own weight. But this risks turning governance into performance art, which is exactly what the proxy wants. But the template was set: use the enemy’s

And as long as you are looking down, you are not looking at the hands that placed the peel. The ludicrous proxy is not a bug in the system of modern power. It is an upgrade. It recognizes that in a world of infinite information and finite attention, credibility is a liability. To be believable is to be constrainable. To be absurd is to be free.

We laugh at the badger, the mime, the hologram. We laugh because the alternative is weeping. But the joke, as always, is on us. The proxy walks away, having accomplished its goal, leaving us to untangle the punchline while the grid collapses and the wetland dies and the election is stolen.