Megalodon: The Monster Shark Lives Here
Here’s a write-up for Megalodon: The Monster Shark Lives , presented as a blend of documentary review and critical analysis. In 2013, the Discovery Channel aired a program that would become one of the most controversial and talked-about events in television history. Megalodon: The Monster Shark Lives was presented as a documentary, but it was something far more provocative: a masterclass in “docufiction” that blurred the line between science and spectacle. The Premise The show opens with grainy, handheld footage of a whale carcass off the coast of South Africa, bearing bite marks that could only belong to a creature of impossible size. Marine biologists, ship captains, and safety inspectors are interviewed with solemn urgency. Their conclusion? Carcharocles megalodon — the prehistoric 60-foot, 50-ton super-predator — never went extinct. It’s still here, lurking in the uncharted depths.
And it worked. The Monster Shark Lives became the highest-rated Shark Week program ever, drawing over 4.8 million viewers. Discovery would go on to produce mock sequels ( Megalodon: The New Evidence , Shark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine ), further blurring the line. Megalodon: The Monster Shark Lives is not a documentary. It’s a brilliant, cynical, and wildly entertaining piece of horror-sci-fi dressed in lab coats. If you watch it as a found-footage thriller about a prehistoric shark on a rampage, it’s a blast. If you watch it expecting science, you’ll leave misinformed and angry. megalodon: the monster shark lives
★★★★☆ Rating (as education): ★☆☆☆☆ Here’s a write-up for Megalodon: The Monster Shark
Grab some popcorn, suspend your disbelief, and enjoy the ride. Just don’t cancel your beach vacation afterward — the real ocean’s scariest predators (great whites, box jellyfish, and rip currents) are still the ones you should worry about. The Premise The show opens with grainy, handheld
The narrative follows a fictional research team as they track a series of deadly encounters, including the mysterious sinking of a fishing vessel off Cape Town. Using sonar readings, CGI reenactments, and “expert” testimony, the show builds a chilling case: Megalodon is alive, and it’s hunting. What made The Monster Shark Lives so effective was its execution. It employed every trope of a serious nature documentary: authoritative voiceover (provided by actor Michael Sinterniklaas, not a real narrator), talking-head scientists with impressive credentials, and “never-before-seen” evidence. Viewers tuning in for Discovery’s iconic Shark Week had no reason to suspect they were watching fiction.
Random adjectives, desperate efforts to “humanize” the tech resulted in this huge review to contain next to no information at all.
There is no easy way to say this: software RAID 0 on PCIe is simply retarded.
Thanks for your thoughts
Now just make it affordable
Well, for enterprise it is very affordable for what you get. If you are concerned about consumers/enthusiasts I can see where you are coming from, but this is not meant for them. Next year, however, we may be seeing performance like this trickle down.
More than likely next year
As an enterprise product I can see it as a high-end workstation device but not a server device. The lack of RAIDability seems to limit its use to caching and high-speed scratch work area.
I’ve been informed that PCIe hardware RAID will be available on the Skylake CPU and the Xeon version when it comes out later. Now we’re talking………
so this is a preview, not a review… where are the comparisons to P3700 and PM951?
I don’t have access to those drives. We reviewed the P3700 in another system. Because of that as well as a change in our testing methodology, we cant not graph them side by side. Looking at the P3700’s specific review you can gauge for yourself the approximate performance difference between the two.