Bentley Continental GT3 dancing in the rain - rFactor 2 GT3 Pack

rFactor

Presenting rFactor, the racing simulation series from Image Space Incorporated and now Studio 397. After successfully creating over a dozen products in the previous ten years, including the Formula One and NASCAR franchise games for EA Sports, Image Space took the next logical step in creating a completely new technology base and development process. This new isiMotor 2.0 environment became the foundation on which many exciting products were built for years to come.

The newest creation, rFactor 2, creates a dynamic racing environment that for the first time put you the driver into a racing simulator, instead of just a physics simulator. Changing tires, track surfaces, grip, weather and lighting make rFactor 2 a true challenge to any sim racer.

Which rFactor is right for me?

If you're looking for up-to-date visuals, advanced physics, first-party Studio 397-produced content, and licensed vehicles from major manufacturers and racing series, then rFactor 2 is for you. Want access to a massive amount of third-party mods including dirt racing and drag racing, all working on the open rFactor modding platform? rFactor is what you should be looking at.

Both rFactor and rFactor 2 can be found on Steam (an online digital download games library).

Callaway Corvette C7 GT3-R - rFactor 2 GT3 Pack

eSports

The 2017 Formula E Visa Vegas eRace had a $1,000,000 prize pool, and used rFactor 2 as their simulator. The event and $200,000 1st-place prize was won by Bono Huis, a five time rFactor Formula Sim Racing Champion.

McLaren's World's Fastest Gamer contest promised a role with the Formula 1 team as one of its official simulator drivers, and they used rFactor 2 for their opening and final rounds. The event and role at McLaren was won by Rudy van Buren, a qualifier from the rFactor 2 opening round.

While sim racing eSports are still an emerging field, it's obvious from the results so far that the rFactor 2 simulation platform gives the flexibility in content and features required. This is the simulator you need to take part in events like those above, or upcoming events organized by Studio 397 in a competitive competition structure now in-development.

Bono Huis (foreground) won the 2017 Formula E Visa Vegas eRace using rFactor 2

Nanocad Review [patched] < Full HD >

Download nanoCAD Free. If you hit the XRef wall, upgrade to Plus. You’ll save thousands over AutoCAD for pure 2D drafting.

There are multiple tiers: , nanoCAD Plus (paid, for 2D drafting), and nanoCAD Pro (paid, adding 3D modeling and BIM capabilities). This review focuses mostly on the Free version, then contrasts it with paid upgrades. Key Features | Feature | nanoCAD Free | nanoCAD Plus / Pro | |---------|--------------|--------------------| | Native .dwg support (up to 2024) | ✅ | ✅ | | Classic AutoCAD-like interface & commands | ✅ | ✅ | | 2D drafting & annotation | ✅ | ✅ | | External references (XRefs) | ❌ | ✅ | | Raster image handling | Basic | Advanced | | 3D solid modeling | ❌ | ✅ (Pro) | | BIM / IFC import | ❌ | ✅ (Pro) | | LISP, .NET, C++ API | ❌ | ✅ | | Printing & layouts | Limited | Full | nanocad review

The interface can be switched between (AutoCAD-like) and classic toolbar mode. Performance is snappy even on modest hardware (runs on Windows 7/8/10/11, no macOS/Linux native version). What’s Great (Pros) ✅ Truly free for basic 2D – No watermarks, no time limits, no cloud requirement. ✅ High AutoCAD compatibility – Scripts, blocks, and drawings generally work seamlessly. ✅ Lightweight – Installer is ~300 MB; runs faster than AutoCAD on old PCs. ✅ Familiar interface – If you know AutoCAD, you can use nanoCAD immediately. ✅ Active development – Updates every few months. ✅ Good PDF import/export (in free version too). What’s Lacking (Cons) ❌ No XRefs in free version – This is a dealbreaker for many professionals who rely on external references. ❌ Windows only – No Mac or Linux version. ❌ Limited 3D – Free version has zero 3D; Pro’s 3D is still less mature than BricsCAD or AutoCAD. ❌ No mobile or web app – Desktop only. ❌ Smaller user community – Fewer tutorials, forums, or third-party plugins compared to AutoCAD or DraftSight. ❌ Print/plot quirks – Some users report difficulty with custom paper sizes and CTB/STB plot styles. Pricing (as of 2025) | Version | Price (approx) | License type | |---------|----------------|---------------| | nanoCAD Free | $0 | Perpetual, free | | nanoCAD Plus | $180 / year | Subscription | | nanoCAD Pro | $300 / year | Subscription | Download nanoCAD Free

nanoCAD Free’s (for simple 2D) or DraftSight’s paid tier (more feature-complete). Final Verdict: 7.5/10 nanoCAD is an excellent choice if you need a no-cost, legal, Windows‑only 2D CAD tool with near‑perfect AutoCAD file compatibility and you don’t require XRefs or 3D. There are multiple tiers: , nanoCAD Plus (paid,

Compare to AutoCAD: ~$2,000/year. DraftSight Professional: ~$300/year.

, the $180/year Plus version is a steal for XRef support and advanced raster tools. The Pro version is harder to recommend over BricsCAD or ZWCAD unless you specifically want a lightweight BIM workflow.

FIA Formula E at Hong Kong - rFactor 2 Energize Pack

Contact

DiscordFaceBookTwitterYouTube


rFactor Support:

rFactor 2 forums at: forum.studio-397.com
rFactor 2 Support:

ISIStudio 397